Posted on Dec 25, 2013 by Rick Falkvinge

Politicians Are Ridiculously Dishonest When They Justify Invasion Of Privacy By The World Being More Dangerous

The world is a much safer place now than in previous years. In the 1980s, the threat was total annihilation of the entire world, and today, it’s some terrorists blowing up a vehicle. Yet, politicians deceptively and dishonestly justify endemic mass surveillance by the world being “more dangerous”.

In my last column on Privacy News, I asked myself the question how we arrived at the point where I can’t discuss political work with my colleagues over the phone.

Politicians are pushing this relentless hunt for our private lives by repeating a lie over and over again: that the world has become “more dangerous”. This is obscenely false.

Today, the worst “threat” to society of this type is that some nutjob may blow up a bus on the other side of the continent. While such an occurrence would be nowhere good, it needs to be put into context. In the 1980s, we lived with an everpresent awareness that two superpowers held each other at nuclear gunpoint 24-by-7, and that they may push the red button at any time. When they did, there wouldn’t be a tomorrow.

Every night when we went to sleep, we were aware that tomorrow might not come, if that button was pushed.

There is arguably a level of difference between the entire world disintegrating, as in the 1980s, and a bus blowing up somewhere, as today. And it’s absolutely not in the “more dangerous” direction.

It’s hard to communicate just how ever-present the fear of nuclear annihilation was, so I’ll quote the first verse from the ballad Forever Young by Alphaville, a track that happened to be released in 1984:

Let’s dance in style, let’s dance for a while
Heaven can wait, we’re only watching the skies –
Hoping for the best, but expecting the worst:
Are you gonna drop the bomb or not?

For people growing up today, it will come across as odd – distasteful, even – to be slow-dancing cheek to cheek to such a message. But that’s how everpresent the threat of total annihilation was. We were quite literally falling in love with each other to ballads about nuclear war.

I survived the 1980s. Don’t try to scare me with terrorism.

It’s very troubling to see how many are buying this outrageous lie – that the world would have become “more dangerous”. For the ordinary citizen, it certainly hasn’t: it’s become remarkably safer on several orders of magnitude. But terrorism is useful, as it allows any kind of restrictions in liberty to pass unchallenged.

Looking at the numbers, this has simply no basis in measurable facts. In Europe, on average, 40 people die per year from terrorism. That’s in an area with 500 million people. To put that in perspective, five times as many die from drowning in bathtubs, and over a hundred times as many die from falling down staircases.

Are we spending billions preventing bathtub drownings? No? Then there’s obviously something else at work here.

Terrorism has become the modern version of what communism was in the 1950s, comic books in the 1940s, and jazz music in the 1930s. It’s a scare that can motivate any measure, no matter how ridiculous, and more importantly, no matter how eroding to civil liberties.

It didn’t come as a big surprise when Edward Snowden revealed that the mass surveillance never had been supposed to target terrorism, but that its purpose was always economic, political, diplomatic, and social dominance. The ability to discredit an adversary.

It’s up to all of us to call politicians out on the lies.

About Rick Falkvinge

Rick is Head of Privacy at Private Internet Access. He is also the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. Additionally, he has a tech entrepreneur background and loves good whisky and fast motorcycles.


VPN Service

Leave a Reply to Antimon555 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

13 Comments

  1. Howard Treesong

    I was at an airport. The security drone noticed my distinct distaste for the kabuki theatre they had us go through. “We only do this for your security, sir!”. I had to be grateful for their efforts. I tell her: “I’d much rather not take off my shoes and take my changes on the plane.” She goes: “Well, what about the terrorists?” I reply: “Terrorism only works when you’re afraid.” It didn’t even register. Has anyone ever computed how much money it costs to have us waiting for 2 to 4 hours before checking in at the airport?

    4 years ago
    Reply
    1. Ben Jones

      She goes: “Well, what about the terrorists?

      I would have replied “What about you?”

      4 years ago
      Reply
  2. Guestme

    No, annihilation is still a rising threat; 9 nations have nukes, & some are ‘crazy’. Multinational terrorism increases danger. Nobody has ever been ‘safe’, let alone a nation. Abandoning privacy & rule of law to intercept Granny’s recipe email to Ethel endangers our civilization — yet another threat, and mutual-assured-destruction can’t protect us anymore.

    4 years ago
    Reply
    1. trent

      The danger hasn’t increased. Media coverage has. Too many people today just believe in what they are told..

      4 years ago
      Reply
    2. Jeff Johnson

      And when you ask world leaders today which other world leaders they think are ‘crazy’?

      7 months ago
      Reply
  3. Common Bob

    Exactly this! I’ve survived the bomb, AIDS, random violence, Y2K, 2012. The only thing scary about “Terrorism” is how people are so terrified by these shadows. Perspective is called for so; WW2 550,000 American combat deaths, Vietnam 55,000 American combat deaths, Iraq 1 and 2 5,500 (or so) Terrorism? 5300?
    WTF are we giving up our rights and freedoms for exactly?

    4 years ago
    Reply
    1. Howard Treesong

      George Bush said we had to go shopping to show the terrorists they couldn’t scare us. Of course, now the police forces all throughout the US are equipped like combat teams in a war zone. Hmmm, it doesn’t seem like we’re not scared to me.

      And the elderly ladies in wheel chairs, who get swabbed for explosives residue. Are you actually kidding me? Or the kid, this one got me angry, he was 4 years and wore leg braces. Had to take them off and walk through the naked scanner alone, without his dad being allowed to help him. At what point exactly have we had enough crazy?
      And the binary-liquid bomb. Because when you’re a terrorist on an airplane the thing you really want to do is to play with chemicals that are difficult to mix and that smell bad.

      The whole thing is a sick joke.

      4 years ago
      Reply
  4. Jake

    Thank you for writing this. We need more people to speak out and call the polititions out on their lies.

    4 years ago
    Reply
  5. JamesAZ11

    Check out “Common Sense with Dan Carlin”, his a historian who just had a podcast on a similar topic. I think you’ll like him, you both see things similarly.

    4 years ago
    Reply
  6. paco229

    US armament industry needs a permanent menace to live or survive. The shock they needed to renew the menace came in with 9/11 when they realized that they could be direct victims of terrorist. Until then only japanese were able to throw a direct strike to their territories. And that frightened them. A “fail” of intelligence work allowed both direct attacks…or were they really a “fail”?

    4 years ago
    Reply
  7. davecb

    I suspect old media will complain when it’s their phones that are getting tapped, and will then suggest to the public that it’s A Bad Thing.

    Suggest to all the spies in your acquaintance that watching investigate reporters investigate is the second-best best way to catch terrorists. The best way is to (try to) bribe reporters (;-))

    –dave

    4 years ago
    Reply
  8. FRED PARK

    So true it’s tragic one more time this to will pass.

    3 years ago
    Reply
  9. Antimon555

    Isn’t it great that H-bombs exist, much more death and destruction with just a fraction of the longtime widespread radiation. Now superpowers and their allies don’t have to be as afraid of killing the entire Earth when they bomb each other to smithereens as before, so they can start with much less provocation.

    (Note, above may contain traces of irony.)

    Humans are really resourceful when it comes to killing each other. We’d be exploring outer space now if all that resourcefulness had been used better.

    3 years ago
    Reply