Encryption: Now It's In Your Control
UPDATE (Sun Sep 22 18:51:04 UTC 2013): We have released a new Windows version with a bug fix for some of the issues you saw. The Windows link below has the new version.
To our beloved customers,
As promised, we've added several new encryption modes/levels to our service. However, even more importantly, we are empowering /you/ to be able to choose the encryption mode/level to your liking.
This application is currently in beta form, but we've tested it quite thoroughly internally. However, if you run into any issues, please be sure to leave a post/reply on this forum thread, and we will address it with utmost priority.
To learn more about the new encryption mode/levels featured in our application, please visit https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/pages/vpn-encryption
Thank you for your business, and please stay safe, stay secret, stay secure.
Yours truly,
Private Internet Access

Comments
[1] https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/pages/vpn-encryption
Additionally, thanks for opening the beta to customers. I'm going to play around with it as soon as detailed OpenVPN instructions arrive.
The page linked here says that AES-128 is fastest for most users. Is this because of the AES instruction set that modern CPUs have?
My desktop CPU is older, intel Q6600, and doesn't support the AES instruction set. Would the Blowfish option be faster for this chip?
Trucrypt had a mode to test throughput for the different crypto suites it supports, but I'm not sure if Blowfish was one of those.
(Disregard the words Slightly and Harder if you think I am ignorant of the way the algorithm is made in each of them. Twofish, despite being better all around, has a minor downside that limits it relatively in a bit for bit comparison to Blowfish.)