Thank you PIA

d9163cedd9163ced
in Off-topic Discussion
I think this new policy of removing inappropriate images is bad for trolls and good for users. 

The sock puppets are upset and lying.

This policy doesn't mean PIA is logging or anything or that sort. 

Comments

  • OmniNegroOmniNegro
    I feel there are precious few people who actually bothered to read the rules here. And now they whine that the rules are supposedly being violated just because they are not being permitted to break every rule without any retaliation for it.

    Remain firm PIA. Let the trolls go away. They will be back when they realize that no-one else is going to let them get away with anything they do regularly
  • catcher749catcher749
    Good to know you stand for censorship.

    This policy doesn't mean PIA is logging or anything or that sort. 

    And how do you know? If they are willing to remove a few images they find "offensive", what's to say they don't go after their own users for "offensive" actions? Is PIA going to start censoring sites on their network they find "offensive"?
  • OmniNegroOmniNegro
    edited December 2015

    catcher749 said:
    Good to know you stand for censorship.

    This policy doesn't mean PIA is logging or anything or that sort. 

    And how do you know? If they are willing to remove a few images they find "offensive", what's to say they don't go after their own users for "offensive" actions? Is PIA going to start censoring sites on their network they find "offensive"?
    PIA is just enforcing their rules. These rules have not changed one bit in years. They are just finally enforcing one single part of it.

    *Edit* Drat. Firekitty messed up this post.
  • catcher749catcher749
    Are they going to start censoring porn sites? Since they cannot guarantee everyone using their service is not of legal age.
  • OmniNegroOmniNegro
    catcher749 said:
    Are they going to start censoring porn sites? Since they cannot guarantee everyone using their service is not of legal age.
    That particular problem is not up to them to resolve. This one is. Read the rules.
  • catcher749catcher749
    OmniNegro said:
    catcher749 said:
    Are they going to start censoring porn sites? Since they cannot guarantee everyone using their service is not of legal age.
    That particular problem is not up to them to resolve. This one is. Read the rules.
    Why not? Same issue. Andrew Lee would be ashamed.
  • OmniNegroOmniNegro
    catcher749 said:
    OmniNegro said:
    catcher749 said:
    Are they going to start censoring porn sites? Since they cannot guarantee everyone using their service is not of legal age.
    That particular problem is not up to them to resolve. This one is. Read the rules.
    Why not? Same issue. Andrew Lee would be ashamed.
    No. If another site is hosting porn and does not take precautions, they are at fault if kids wander in there. Here the only posts effected were those posted on the forums hosted by PIA. They had to remove it.
  • catcher749catcher749
    OmniNegro said:
    catcher749 said:
    OmniNegro said:
    catcher749 said:
    Are they going to start censoring porn sites? Since they cannot guarantee everyone using their service is not of legal age.
    That particular problem is not up to them to resolve. This one is. Read the rules.
    Why not? Same issue. Andrew Lee would be ashamed.
    No. If another site is hosting porn and does not take precautions, they are at fault if kids wander in there. Here the only posts effected were those posted on the forums hosted by PIA. They had to remove it.
    No they didn't.
  • catcher749catcher749
    PIA wants less rights as opposed to more. I wonder if the passage of CISA has given these vigilantes tinytrex and matthewk initiative to make up their own rules that infringe on the rights of some.
  • OmniNegroOmniNegro
    God said:
    There are hundreds of sites that host porn that is available for anyone to see. No age verification. Nothing. These sites continue to operate without restrictions or censorship. You censorship bitches will lose.
    Keep on. You two will tire of whining in a few hours. I am going to take a nap while you soil yourselves and cry.
  • d9163cedd9163ced
    God said:
    You are lying. The war is about to get very ugly and vicious. Censorship won't be tolerated. We will continue to post until we win..you little whining bitch
    You are little one bitching here aka Robert
  • d9163cedd9163ced
    God said:
    Pia's current excuse for censoring porn is that someone under age 18 might see the images. So what? I'm sure pia has customers of the vpn under age 18 that use the vpn to view porn. You can't have it both ways pia. Your reason and excuse is bullshit and you mother fucking know it. It's time for war.
    Many people use vpn for privacy and to torrent, not to watch porn.
  • d9163cedd9163ced
    edited December 2015
    There was a little doubt if robert and catcher were the same. Now, it seems to be resolved for everyone probably. It seems catcher is the guy behind robert and all other sock puppet. If catcher is really a different guy, I apologize. This is just an observation.

    For example :

    Compare these two comments

    "
    God

    There are hundreds of sites that host porn that is available for anyone to see. No age verification.

    Nothing. These sites continue to operate without restrictions or censorship. You censorship bitches will lose.

    PIA wants less rights as opposed to more. I wonder if the passage of CISA has given these vigilantes tinytrex and matthewk initiative to make up their own rules that infringe on the rights of some"

    "

    We all thought Robert couldn't frame proper sentences but look he can and two comments look like part of the same paragraph.

    Again, If catcher is really a different guy, I apologize.
  • catcher749catcher749
    So you just resort to calling us the same person? Because you have no legible defense for blatant censorship? Pathetic tactic.
  • d9163cedd9163ced
    edited December 2015
    catcher749 said:
    So you just resort to calling us the same person? Because you have no legible defense for blatant censorship? Pathetic tactic.
    There is no blatant censorship. Just porn. Would move to another vpn if ever there was blatant censorship.
  • catcher749catcher749
    d9163ced said:
    catcher749 said:
    So you just resort to calling us the same person? Because you have no legible defense for blatant censorship? Pathetic tactic.
    There is no blatant censorship. Just porn. Would move to another vpn if ever there was blatant censorship.
    Pornography is protected speech.

    ACLU vs Reno

    Held: The CDA's "indecent transmission" and "patently offensive display" provisions abridge "the freedom of speech" protected by the First Amendment. Pp. 17-40.


  • d9163cedd9163ced
    catcher749 said:
    d9163ced said:
    catcher749 said:
    So you just resort to calling us the same person? Because you have no legible defense for blatant censorship? Pathetic tactic.
    There is no blatant censorship. Just porn. Would move to another vpn if ever there was blatant censorship.
    Pornography is protected speech.

    ACLU vs Reno

    Held: The CDA's "indecent transmission" and "patently offensive display" provisions abridge "the freedom of speech" protected by the First Amendment. Pp. 17-40.


    So? You are saying it is ok if someone floods these forum with porn? Do you want PIA to go out of business? PIA is a private company and has a wide user-base.

    PIA forum is different from PIA vpn service.
  • catcher749catcher749
    d9163ced said:
    catcher749 said:
    d9163ced said:
    catcher749 said:
    So you just resort to calling us the same person? Because you have no legible defense for blatant censorship? Pathetic tactic.
    There is no blatant censorship. Just porn. Would move to another vpn if ever there was blatant censorship.
    Pornography is protected speech.

    ACLU vs Reno

    Held: The CDA's "indecent transmission" and "patently offensive display" provisions abridge "the freedom of speech" protected by the First Amendment. Pp. 17-40.


    So? You are saying it is ok if someone floods these forum with porn? Do you want PIA to go out of business? PIA is a private company and has a wide user-base.

    PIA forum is different from PIA vpn service.
    So my rights end when your feelings get hurt?
  • d9163cedd9163ced
    edited December 2015
    catcher749 said:
    d9163ced said:
    catcher749 said:
    d9163ced said:
    catcher749 said:
    So you just resort to calling us the same person? Because you have no legible defense for blatant censorship? Pathetic tactic.
    There is no blatant censorship. Just porn. Would move to another vpn if ever there was blatant censorship.
    Pornography is protected speech.

    ACLU vs Reno

    Held: The CDA's "indecent transmission" and "patently offensive display" provisions abridge "the freedom of speech" protected by the First Amendment. Pp. 17-40.


    So? You are saying it is ok if someone floods these forum with porn? Do you want PIA to go out of business? PIA is a private company and has a wide user-base.

    PIA forum is different from PIA vpn service.
    So my rights end when your feelings get hurt?
    You always have the choice to go watch porn in another site. You haven't hurt anyone's feelings. There are thousands of porn out there.

    People come here for technical help and to talk about things related to vpn and privacy. They don't come here to see any other person naked.

    There is a level of forum decency and common sense and mutual respect.
  • d9163cedd9163ced
    edited December 2015
    God said:
    Censorship is wrong.bitch.
    Why are you bitching like a real bitch? I aplogize for having to say it.
  • d9163cedd9163ced
    edited December 2015
    Anyway, Enjoy talking to each other sock puppets.

    Bye.
  • d9163cedd9163ced

    God said:
    Because you are a shining little bitch. You will lose. This war is about to get ugly and vicious.
    You are just proving yourself to be what you call others to be. Bye.


  • catcher749catcher749
    Yeah go run away to proxy.sh. They will uphold your censorship ideals.
Sign In or Register to comment.