Posted on Mar 19, 2014 by Rick Falkvinge

What’s Privacy Good For, Anyway?

“I’ve got nothing to hide, so I’ve got nothing to worry about.”

If you talk about privacy to your circle of friends, how many of them are going to respond more or less exactly that?

That sentence is, unfortunately, rather common. It’s also one of the most dangerously ignorant attitudes toward privacy today. It assumes that your particular habits – normal everyday habits that hurt nobody – aren’t going to be outlawed by the next parliament for no good reason. It assumes that you are 100% law-abiding, even by the smallest stupid laws, which you are not (nobody is). It assumes that you aren’t doing anything at all that could be construed as something else by an adversary looking for patterns that deviate from anything ordinary.

There are many things we do every day that would cause trouble for us if the wrong person used it against us. This is the case for everybody. That’s why we have this concept of privacy. It’s a safeguard that the small infractions we do every day – jaywalking, speeding a little to keep with the traffic flow, just making society work with its all written and unwritten rules, that all those small infractions are regularly ignored. (The written and unwritten rulesets tend to contradict each other to no small degree.)

Most of the things that could cause trouble for us in the wrong hands aren’t even illegal, just taboo in one form of another. Imagine a British politician having any form of sex, for instance, that came to public knowledge through whatever mechanism. Natural as it is for every person – no, every creature of every species on the planet, it would still kill that politician’s career, due to unwritten rules.

There’s a reason the NSA is gathering tons of communications with the explicit goal of finding something to discredit undesirable and troublesome individuals.

Did you ever do something that was the least troublesome for anybody in power? No? Somebody richer than you, somebody more influential? Of course you did. Everybody does. To assure that this keeps happening, our checks and balances lay out a clear framework that is supposed to make people equal before the law. Mass surveillance kills that principle and puts might ahead of right.

This conflict between written and unwritten laws, by the way, isn’t exploitable just by people in power. There’s a beautiful form of labor conflict in South America called strike to rule, where workers insist on following every single written rule. Every single time, it grinds production to a halt. When bus drivers in a major city – possibly Buenos Aires – went on strike, they decided to follow every single traffic rule. The entire city got gridlocked in a heartbeat.

We need to be aware that there is a clear and present conflict between written laws and unwritten rules that make society tick, and that we’re normally expected to let the latter take precedence over the former. But with mass surveillance that erodes privacy, you can be held accountable for breaching either ruleset – which you must necessarily do as they conflict.

This is how selective enforcement comes into play. As in, selective law enforcement. When you have so much data on everybody, and know that everybody is breaking the law or the rules on a daily if not hourly basis, then that shifts priorities dramatically.

At that point, law enforcement shifts its operations from punishing troublesome actions to punishing troublesome individuals.

This is why privacy is important.

Freedom of speech isn’t just the freedom to state any opinion or observation you like. It’s the ability to state any opinion or observation without fear of repercussion for doing so. That’s a much, much stronger freedom, and is critical for keeping power in check.

If you lay out the case for privacy like this to your friends, odds are that they’ll respond with something completely different than the “I have nothing to hide” clich√©. If they still don’t get the picture, ask them if they lock the door behind them when they go to the restroom, and the following conversation is likely to take place:

— Of course I lock the door when I go to the restroom. Doesn’t everybody?
— So what do you have to hide in there? What laws are you breaking?
— What? None! I just want some privacy, I think I have a right to that!

Then watch the penny drop, in most cases.

About Rick Falkvinge

Rick is Head of Privacy at Private Internet Access. He is also the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. Additionally, he has a tech entrepreneur background and loves good whisky and fast motorcycles.


VPN Service
  • Jonna Puroj√§rvi

    Greetings from Finland, a fellow pirate here. I wrote something about privacy a few years back but the text has disappeared from the web since then. I’ll try to summarize something now.

    I strongly believe, that people would be a lot happier, if they had no need to hide anything. The fact, that we need to hide even the obedient things from one another, just not to be moralized for example, is absurd. Who really enjoys keeping secrets? It is a studied fact that the need to keep secrets can cause a variety of health problems.

    If the main reason to violate someone’s privacy is to hurt that person, I think we should all take a good look in the mirror and think, why are we letting that information leakage to hurt that person? Is that person really that bad or could it just be that one is just like any other human being? We all make mistakes and odd things, some may seem worse than others, but we all do them.

    I know that we need a lot of political activism to stop all this surveillance but in the mean time since the surveillance is getting worse by day and hiding isn’t going to help, we need a lot of different kind of activism, too. I think that we need to have individuals who really feel like they have nothing to hide (even though there would be a law against of something one has done). We need to set the atmosphere all around the world where we are not judging others, and have strong enough people to take it as long as there are judgemental masses. Of course no one should be forced to this, since one must really be in terms with oneself and be aware of possible consequences and not be scared of them. Without that, minds can be crushed and lives ruined.

    To be in a state where you have nothing to fear, you’ll have nothing to lose.

    There is a need for change in the way our governments work all around the world, and as long as they feel (and people believe) that the ordinary people are the problem, governments are not just unwilling, but also incapable to find the problems in themselves.

    Media, and not just the mainstream one, is the master of judging, and we should stop listening to that garbage. There is simply no person who could stand in some imaginary moral high-ground compared to others. Only when the atmosphere is that there really is nothing to hide – no need to hide – we can hope for all this surveillance to loosen up as it will lose it’s power over people. If people are demanding heads to be cut, we will get our privacy cut little by little until we are all treated as objects, not as persons that we are.

    We need to put the real problems on the table that are causing all the terrible actions all around the world, so we would be able to really heal the wounds we have as individuals and as societies. Just be what we are without the fear of past mistakes. Be brave enough to face the past and make peace with it. Be proud of being able to live with the past and having learned from it.