Posted on Dec 11, 2016 by Rick Falkvinge

The war on cash being justified as “necessary against organized crime” is the worst excuse ever




There is a “war on cash” going on from the central banks, trying to reduce the usage (and personal storage) of cash. This is something that makes sense as a power move against the common people in a time of forced negative interest rates, but it is a shocking reduction of liberty and privacy (of finance), not to mention that the official justifications don’t hold a shred of water. What’s really behind this trend?

Would you like your government to have more insight into your personal finances than you have yourself? That’s where we’re heading with the ongoing “war on cash” – into a world where every transaction is not just loggable by the government (or a government-coerced agent), but where you can also be held responsible for anything and everything you buy and sell.

There’s both a carrot and a stick in this scheme of making everything traceable and trackable. The stick consists of outright bans on cash transactions – several European countries have banned cash transactions exceeding 1,000 euros. Uruguay has banned cash transactions over $5,000. Even Switzerland has proposed banning cash transactions over 100,000 Swiss francs (admittedly a high number, but once a government declares a right to ban cash transactions, the number is a matter of degree and not principle).

The carrots and incentives for not using cash, meanwhile, mostly take the form of making it easier to pay using cards. The latest example of Amazon Go, a brick-and-mortar store where there’s no checkout at all but you just grab what you want and leave, is one example of such a carrot. It is undeniably more convenient than standing in an annoying checkout line. Combine this with various fees for withdrawing cash from your own account in the bank, and the incentives become clearer.

But why pursue this direction? There are many conceivable reasons for wanting to eliminate cash from circulation altogether. ZeroHedge has homed in on the elimination of cash being an absolute necessity to maintain a zero-interest (or even negative-interest) policy, which in turn remains necessary to prevent a financial bloodbath. Others have talked about the costs inherent in transporting cash in armored cars, or the risk of robbery being eliminated.

From a national policymaking perspective, though, the general excuse seems to be to “make it difficult for organized crime”. This was the excuse behind the elimination of the 500-euro note, for example.

But from a national perspective, this excuse makes absolutely no sense at all. At the national level, the game is to dominate other countries. Petty organized crime is not really relevant at that level, unless it is useful in the context of dominating other countries. And that’s where we find that this excuse – this “we need to be tough on organized crime” – is a complete Maskirovka, a complete façade, an utter lie. It doesn’t make sense at all.

The notion of a currency being used as a default currency in global organized crime is a concept that has geopolitical strategists positively salivating.

Organized crime – which in many cases is just free and consensual non-aggressive trade which is still governmentally banned – is a significant part of the global economy, an estimated ten per cent. A very significant part, one that uses large amounts of currency in cash format. If you’re responsible for dominating other countries, one of the best and safest ways to do this is to pull strings that increase the value of your currency. We know from supply-and-demand lessons that this can take the form of causing the demand for the currency to increase.

If your currency is the default trade currency for organized crime, this brings an enormous benefit to your economy as a whole – it has been estimated that it means as much as 25% higher standard of living, for everybody. Given this number, there are two immediate and obvious observations:

1) A crackdown on cash transactions with the excuse of “combating organized crime” is utter bollocks of the highest order. When you’re working on the national policy level, you’re doing your utmost to have organized crime use your currency and nobody else’s. It’s the equivalent of printing lots of free money – roughly the equivalent of 10% of the world’s GDP.

2) More concerningly, given the enormous benefit of having organized crime use your own currency, what concern is more pressing than this – 10% global GDP essentially for free – that is the actual cause for these actions to fight cash?

Liberty and privacy, including financial privacy, remain your own responsibility.

About Rick Falkvinge

Rick is Head of Privacy at Private Internet Access. He is also the founder of the first Pirate Party and is a political evangelist, traveling around Europe and the world to talk and write about ideas of a sensible information policy. Additionally, he has a tech entrepreneur background and loves good whisky and fast motorcycles.


VPN Service
  • kritikl

    The governments and its Central Banks Institutions are now ready to tighten the nooze around your neck (almost like a cyber gun to your head) and force upon you (the civilian) and to obtain forcebly every bit of your privacy including your finances and monitor you and all of your transactions, and make whatever changes necessary to get you, whether or not you are a criminal or innocent bystander. AND FOR WHAT REASON? The Russians are coming, The Russians are coming, and we will always protect you from the invading Russians!

  • Variable

    Monero

  • mauriceh

    I think you missed the obvious, but less nefarious reason: Bank profit
    Transactions by cards and accounts carry a “merchant fee” of from 2% to 5% on all transactions.
    Basically the banks charge a “spending tax” on everything.
    It is now finally become so bad that some larger merchants, such as Walmart and Home Depot, in Canada, are starting to refuse American Express and VISA as methods of payment, because their charges are too high ( 3% for VISA, 4% for AMEX).

  • kritikl

    Not even the coveted “cashiers check” enables you to the goods that you desire when you are in a rush and have limited time to proceed to the next avenue on time. The old saying is true to this day: cash is the king. Nobody has the right to suspect another as being devious simply because that person is paying cash. Prove the other person as devious before you point the finger at him. A legal tender as form of payment does not mean it is tainted with corruption and criminal behavior.

  • kritikl

    When your credit card or debit card suddenly and misteriously blocks you from making payment, cash saves you. So why should I rely on something that is full of defects for no reason than technical error occured. And no amount of apologies can resolve the nightmare that you go through and redeem you of the suffering. Sorry is not an answer.