These are the 23 Senators that introduced a bill to let telecoms sell your private internet history

Posted on Mar 8, 2017 by Caleb Chen
internet history privacy challenged in senate

Protection of your Internet history is up in the air thanks to new, pending legislation. A new bill coming before Senate aims to completely dismantle the FCC’s ability to enact data security or online privacy protections for consumers under the powers of the Congressional Review Act. Senate Joint Resolution (S.J.Res 34) was introduced by Arizona Senator Jeff Flake and cosponsored by 23 other Senators. Its goal is to remove all the hard-earned net neutrality regulations gained to protect your internet history from advertisers and and worse. Specifically, the FCC had been able to prevent internet service providers (ISPs) from spying on your internet history, and selling what they gathered, without express permission. This legal protection on your internet history is currently under attack thanks to these 23 Senators and lots of ISP lobbying spend. While S.J.Res 34 has support from two dozen Republican Senators, Senators willing to champion the privacy of Americans’ internet history have also come out of the woodwork.

The House version of this bill is H.J.Res 86.

These 23 Senators want to let your internet history be sold

The list of 23 Senators cosponsoring this bill, including Senator Jeff Flake, is:

– John Barrasso (R-Wyo.)
– Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.)
– Roy Blunt (R-Mo.)
– John Boozman (R-Ark.)
– Shelly Moore Capito (R-W.Va.)
– Thad Cochran (R-Miss.)
– John Cornyn (R-Texas)
– Tom Cotton (R-Ark.)
– Ted Cruz (R-Texas)
– Deb Fischer (R-Neb.)
– Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)
– Dean Heller (R-Nev.)
– James Inhofe (R-Okla.)
– Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.)
– Mike Lee (R-Utah)
– Rand Paul (R-Ky.)
– Pat Roberts (R-Kan.)
– Marco Rubio (R-Fla.)
– Richard Shelby (R-Ala.)
– Dan Sullivan (R-Ala.)
– John Thune (R-S.D.)
– Roger Wicker (R-Miss.)
– Jerry Moran (R-Kan.)

Some politicians understand that S.J.Res 34 is a step back for Internet privacy

Today, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai appeared before the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee for a hearing about Oversight of the FCC. While online privacy was not much on the agenda, it was very much on the minds of many Senators that oppose the end of net neutrality. Afterwards, according to PC World’s Grant Gross, Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey said:

“I fear [the privacy rollback] is just a preview of coming attractions. Big broadband companies don’t want to give consumer privacy protections the attention they deserve.”

Senator Markey also issued a statement specifically against Senator Flake’s resolution blocking FCC regulation of ISPs:

“Consumers will have no ability to stop Internet service providers from invading their privacy and selling sensitive information about their health, finances, and children to advertisers, insurers, data brokers or others who can profit off of this personal information, all without their affirmative consent.”

In a separate statement, Hawaiian Senator Brian Schatz said:

“If this [resolution] is passed, neither the FCC nor the FTC will have clear authority when it comes to how Internet service providers protect consumers’ data privacy and security.”

The end goal of passing ISP regulation onto the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will require further Congressional action, another privacy damaging step that is inevitably coming this year. Private Internet Access is supporting the EFF in calling all Americans to heed the call: “Don’t let Congress Undermine Our Online Privacy.” When S.J.Res 34 comes to a vote, make sure to take note of which Senators vote which way. It is important to hold politicians accountable for their stances and their actions.

Like this article? Get notified by email when there is a new article or signup to receive the latest news in the fight for Privacy via the Online Privacy News RSS Feed.

Editor’s note: Senator Ron Johnson is listed as a cosponsor twice by Senator Flake’s official announcement of S.J.Res 34 on his website. There are only 23 Senators sponsoring this bill.

VPN Service

Comments are closed.

106 Comments

  1. Dr. Bob

    Tor + VPN = fuck you, Republicans.

    5 years ago
    1. CraKo56

      Yeah that’s kind of their point. Go to the market. The privacy protected, free internet doesn’t exist.

      5 years ago
  2. Andrea Talbert

    Senator Dan Sullivan is from Alaska, not Alabama.

    5 years ago
  3. Bill Richardson

    If you have an (R) next to your name, you’re basically a piece of shit.

    5 years ago
    1. Scientific Squirrel

      Umm no.

      5 years ago
      1. Benjamin Jason Tift

        um yes

        5 years ago
  4. BettB

    –It’s not a step -back- because they never had such liberty to peer into your browsing. It’s a step DOWN. More like a leap. Into hell.
    –That being said, though, know that if you’re not blocking and removing various current tracking cookies, LSO cookies, web beacons and other lovely bits of code that betray your movements online, they already know everything you do.
    –Time to learn about trackers, web beacons, blocking cookies, LSO cookies and more, as well as fight like hell against this.

    5 years ago
    1. justme

      Who do you think will win? people are so gullible, they all be sucked in by the innovation of technology, look at how they get in line for days, to buy a 700 dollar phone, the same phone that is tracking them, they do not care, they want to have it, and as this crap progresses, the surveillance gets deeper and harder to fight, we do not have any info, they keep it under control, ignorance is a bliss, we all like the net, we like to know the true, but, when and where is the limit to what they do to us, how can you fight something you do not see or know about it.

      5 years ago
    2. Scientific Squirrel

      they look today. just saying. without encryption you are actively being punked.

      5 years ago
    3. Benjamin Jason Tift

      no one cares if the isp LOOKS we care if they SELL our personal info

      5 years ago
  5. DaveTheMan

    How much where they Bribed?

    5 years ago
    1. Shirley Lane

      Yep. You can ALWAYS follow the money when and Ds or Rs make bad policy decisions for the rest of us. Always.

      5 years ago
      1. Scientific Squirrel

        This is actually the right policy choice.

        I want TOR services to be built.

        5 years ago