Posted on Jun 21, 2016 by Caleb Chen

Join the EFF against the Rule 41 update which lets federal judges unconstitutionally hack you


stop rule 41 eff

A proposed amendment to Rule 41 of United States Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure could grant blatantly unconstitutional rights to American judges. The proposed new powers would allow US federal judges to grant search warrants for remote access of a target computer in cases where“the district where the media or information is located has been concealed through technological means.” That is to say, if Rule 41 isn’t shot down in Congress, law enforcement will be able to find American judges that are more than willing to issue warrants for any computer whose IP address is hidden by Tor or a VPN service. The Rule 41 update is so ambiguous that law enforcement could use the rule to go after those of us that deny location data to certain smartphone apps. If that weren’t bad enough by itself, the second part of the Rule 41 update allows for law enforcement to use malware on a botnet infected computer with the purpose of finding the botnet operator. Instead, what is likely to be found is a bunch of private information which we can’t trust the government to delete. We must do all that we can to avoid such a dystopian, Orwellian future.

Join the EFF against Rule 41

To combat this egregious overstep of government power, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has organized a day of action today June, 21, 2016, to push for public debate on this proposed change to law enforcement’s hacking capabilities. As a special sustaining supporter of the EFF’s work, Private Internet Access stands strong with the EFF in this Day of Action. Make no mistake, the potential new powers of the United States government allows it to easily get a warrant to breach a suspected computer anywhere in the world.

The proposed change has been passed from the Supreme Court and will go into effect in December unless the United States Congress acts against it. To help, US residents should send an email to your representative in Congress via this form provided by the EFF. Non US residents can still spread the word over the internet because this overexertion of power has far reaching, international consequences. Laws like this cannot be made by non-elected officials precisely because they cannot be held accountable to the citizens they supposedly serve. Join the EFF to strike down the proposed Rule 41 update – it is an affront to our privacy.

About Caleb Chen

Caleb Chen is a digital currency and privacy advocate who believes we must #KeepOurNetFree, preferably through decentralization. Caleb holds a Master's in Digital Currency from the University of Nicosia as well as a Bachelor's from the University of Virginia. He feels that the world is moving towards a better tomorrow, bit by bit by Bitcoin.


VPN Service

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. Zach Cooper

    Especially concerning when one considers that a warrant to access a VPN concealed computer would enable them to access devices far outside their jurisdiction. For example I use VPN and live in Australia. If this law passed it would allow them to access my tech despite me not being a legal citizen of their country, or subject to their national laws. Which would be veeeery suss.

    1 year ago
    Reply
    1. Caleb Chen

      Zach, you are correct and I should have included that additional egregious overstep in my blog post. Suss indeed!

      1 year ago
      Reply
    2. Marcus2012

      If anything foreigners is who they should hack, not citizens.

      1 year ago
      Reply
      1. Zach Cooper

        The local police should be hacking foreigners? Okay. Sure. And in a diplomatic sense it’s a massive no-no to hack citizens of an allied nation without colluding with representatives from whichever nation/s makes sense. Like, if you tap a terrorist’s phone or hack their laptop you’re generally doing so AFTER you inform the government who has jurisdiction over them. This is a very complicated issue, and your response ignores soooooo much.

        1 year ago
        Reply